<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Am I drinking the Google Analytics Kool Aid?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.expertsem.com/2010/01/19/am-i-drinking-the-google-analytics-kool-aid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.expertsem.com/2010/01/19/am-i-drinking-the-google-analytics-kool-aid/</link>
	<description>advanced ideas for interactive marketing pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:55:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Claudiu</title>
		<link>http://www.expertsem.com/2010/01/19/am-i-drinking-the-google-analytics-kool-aid/comment-page-1/#comment-72631</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.expertsem.com/?p=2795#comment-72631</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex,

I use both of the services and I have to agree that Yahoo Web Analytics rocks big time. 

I find YWA very customizable and I love the real time tracking... However it still lacks features I use on a daily bases in Google Analytics like pivoting, intelligence and different goal types. I find the segmentation feature in Google Analytics easier to use as well.

In my opinion they are both great solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex,</p>
<p>I use both of the services and I have to agree that Yahoo Web Analytics rocks big time. </p>
<p>I find YWA very customizable and I love the real time tracking&#8230; However it still lacks features I use on a daily bases in Google Analytics like pivoting, intelligence and different goal types. I find the segmentation feature in Google Analytics easier to use as well.</p>
<p>In my opinion they are both great solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
